Day Eleven, Cushing's Awareness Challenge

In March of 1987, after the endo finally  confirmed that I had Cushing's, I saw sent to a local hospital where they repeated all those same tests for another week and decided that it was not my adrenal gland (Cushing's Syndrome) creating the problem. The doctors and nurses had no idea what to do with me, so they put me on the brain cancer ward.

When I left this hospital after a week, we didn't know any more than we had before.

As luck would have it, NIH (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) was doing a clinical trial of Cushing's. I live in the same area as NIH so it was not too inconvenient but very scary at first to think of being tested there. At that time I only had a choice of NIH, Mayo Clinic and a place in Quebec to do this then-rare pituitary surgery called a Transsphenoidal Resection.

My husband asked my endo if it were his wife, if he would recommend this surgery.  The endo responded that he was divorcing his wife - he didn't care what happened to her.  Oh, my!

I chose NIH - closest and free. After I was interviewed by the Doctors there, I got a letter that I had been accepted into the clinical trial.

The night before I was admitted, I signed my will.  I was sure I was going to die there.  If not during testing, as a result of surgery.

The first time I was there was for 6 weeks as an inpatient. More of the same tests.

There were about 12 of us there and it was nice not to be alone with this mystery disease. Many of these Cushies (mostly women) were getting bald, couldn't walk, having strokes, had diabetes. One was blind, one had a heart attack while I was there. Several were from Greece.

Towards the end of my testing period, I was looking forward to the surgery just to get this whole mess over with - either a cure or dying. While I was at NIH, I was gaining about a pound a day!

During the time I was home the weekend  before surgery, a college classmate of mine (I didn't know her) DID die at NIH of a Cushing's-related problem. I'm so glad I didn't find out until reading the alumnae magazine a couple months later!  She was the same class, same major, same home-town, same disease...

We have a Scottish doctor named James Lind to thank for the clinical trial.  He  conducted the first ever clinical trial in 1747 and developed the theory that citrus fruits cured scurvy.  Lind  compared the effects of various different acidic substances, ranging from vinegar to cider, on groups of afflicted sailors, and found that the group who were given oranges and lemons had largely recovered from scurvy after 6 days.

I'd like to think that I advanced the knowledge of Cushing's at least a little bit by being a guinea  pig in 1987-1989.

From the NIH: http://endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/cushings/cushings.aspx

Hope through Research

Several components of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) conduct and support research on Cushing's syndrome and other disorders of the endocrine system, including the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the National Cancer Institute, and the National Center for Research Resources.

NIH-supported scientists are conducting intensive research into the normal and abnormal function of the major endocrine glands and the many hormones of the endocrine system. Researchers continue to study the effects of excess cortisol, including its effect on brain structure and function. To refine the diagnostic process, studies are under way to assess the accuracy of existing screening tests and the effectiveness of new imaging techniques to evaluate patients with ectopic ACTH syndrome. Researchers are also investigating jugular vein sampling as a less invasive alternative to petrosal sinus sampling. Research into treatment options includes study of a new drug to treat the symptoms of Cushing's syndrome caused by ectopic ACTH secretion.

Studies are under way to understand the causes of benign endocrine tumor formation, such as those that cause most cases of Cushing's syndrome. In a few pituitary adenomas, specific gene defects have been identified and may provide important clues to understanding tumor formation. Endocrine factors may also play a role. Increasing evidence suggests that tumor formation is a multistep process. Understanding the basis of Cushing's syndrome will yield new approaches to therapy.

The NIH supports research related to Cushing's syndrome at medical centers throughout the United States. Scientists are also treating patients with Cushing's syndrome at the NIH Clinical Center in Bethesda, MD. Physicians who are interested in referring an adult patient may contact Lynnette Nieman, M.D., at NICHD, 10 Center Drive, Room 1-3140, Bethesda, MD 20892-1109, or by phone at 301-496-8935. Physicians interested in referring a child or adolescent may contact Constantine Stratakis, M.D., D.Sc., at NICHD, 10 Center Drive, Room 1-3330, Bethesda, MD 20892-1103, or by phone at 301-402-1998.

 

Day Three, Cushing's Awareness Challenge

On Becoming Empowered. Adapted from my blog post Participatory Medicine

This is kind of a "cheat" post since it's a compilation of other posts, web pages, message board posts and some original thoughts.  I wrote it to submit to Robin's Grand Rounds, hosted  on her blog.

 

For all of my early life, I was the good, compliant, patient.  I took whatever pills the doctor prescribed, did whatever tests h/she (most always a he) wrote for.  Believed that whatever he said was the absolute truth.  He had been to med school.  He knew what was wrong with me even though he didn't live in my body 24/7 and experience what I did.

I know a lot of people are still like this.  Their doctor is like a god to them.  He can do no wrong - even if they don't feel any better after treatment, even if they feel worse.  "But the doctor said..."

Anyway, I digress.

All this changed for me in 1983.

At first I noticed I'd stopped having my periods and, of course, I thought I was pregnant. I went to my Gynecologist who had no explanation. Lots of women lose their periods for a variety of reasons so no one thought that this was really significant.

Then I got really tired, overly tired. I would take my son to a half hour Choir rehearsal and could not stay awake for the whole time. I would lie down in the back of the van, set an alarm and sleep for the 30 minutes.

A whole raft of other symptoms started appearing - I grew a beard (Hirsuitism), gained weight even though I was on Weight Watchers and working out at the gym nearly every day, lost my period, everything hurt, got what is called a "moon face" and a "buffalo hump" on the back of my neck. I also got stretch marks. I was very depressed but it's hard to say if that was because of the hormone imbalance or because I felt so bad and no one would listen to me.

I came across a little article in the Ladies Home Journal magazine which said "If you have these symptoms...ask your doctor about Cushing's". After that, I started reading everything I could on Cushing's and asking my doctors. Due to all my reading at the library and medical books I bought, I was sure I had Cushing's but no one would believe me. Doctors would say that Cushing's Disease is too rare, that I was making this up and that I couldn't have it.

I asked doctors for three years - PCP, gynecologist, neurologist, podiatrist - all said the now-famous refrain.  It's too rare.  You couldn't have Cushing's.  I kept persisting in my reading, making copies of library texts even when I didn't understand them, keeping notes.  I just knew that someone, somewhere would "discover" that I had Cushing's.

My husband was on the doctors' sides.  He was sure it was all in my mind (as opposed to all in my head!) and he told me to just think "happy thoughts" and it would all go away.

A Neurologist gave me Xanax. Since he couldn't see my tumor with his Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) machine there was "no possibility" that it existed. Boy was he wrong!

Later in 1986 I started bruising incredibly easily. I could touch my skin and get a bruise. On New Year's Day of 1987 I started bleeding under the skin. My husband made circles around the outside perimeter each hour with a marker, like the rings of a tree. When I went to my Internist the next day he was shocked at the size. He now thought I had a blood disorder so he sent me to a Hematologist/Oncologist.

Fortunately, the Hematologist/Oncologist ran a twenty-four hour urine test and really looked at me. Both he and his partner recognized that I had Cushing's. Of course, he was sure that he did the diagnosis.  No matter that I had been pursuing this with other doctors for 3 years.

It was not yet determined if it was Cushing's Disease (Pituitary) or Syndrome (Adrenal). However, he couldn't help me any further so the Hematologist referred me to an Endocrinologist.

The Endocrinologist, of course, didn't trust the other tests I had had done so I was back to square one. He ran his own multitude of tests. He had to draw blood at certain times like 9 AM. and 5 PM. There was a dexamethasone suppression test where I took a pill at 10 p.m. and gave blood at 9 am the next day. I collected gallons of urine in BIG boxes (Fun in the fridge!). Those were from 6 a.m. to 6 a.m. to be delivered to his office by 9 a.m. same day. I was always worried that I'd be stopped in rush hour and the police would ask about what was in that big container. I think I did those for a week. He also did standard neurological tests and asked lots of questions.

When the endo confirmed that I had Cushing's in 1987 he sent me to a local hospital where they repeated all those same tests for another week and decided that it was not my adrenal gland (Cushing's Syndrome) creating the problem. The doctors and nurses had no idea what to do with me, so they put me on the brain cancer ward.

When I left this hospital after a week, we didn't know any more than we had before.

As luck would have it, NIH (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) was doing a clinical trial of Cushing's. I live in the same area as NIH so it was not too inconvenient but very scary at first to think of being tested there. At that time I only had a choice of NIH, Mayo Clinic and a place in Quebec to do this then-rare pituitary surgery called a Transsphenoidal Resection. I chose NIH - closest and free. After I was interviewed by the Doctors there, I got a letter that I had been accepted into the clinical trial. The first time I was there was for 6 weeks as an inpatient. More of the same tests.

There were about 12 of us there and it was nice not to be alone with this mystery disease. Many of these Cushies (mostly women) were getting bald, couldn't walk, having strokes, had diabetes. One was blind, one had a heart attack while I was there. Towards the end of my testing period, I was looking forward to the surgery just to get this whole mess over with. While I was at NIH, I was gaining about a pound a day!

The MRI still showed nothing, so they did a Petrosal Sinus Sampling Test. That scared me more than the prospect of surgery. (This test carries the risk of stroke and uncontrollable bleeding from the incision points.) Catheters were fed from my groin area to my pituitary gland and dye was injected. I could watch the whole procedure on monitors. I could not move during this test or for several hours afterwards to prevent uncontrolable bleeding from a major artery. The test did show where the tumor probably was located. Also done were more sophisticated dexamethasone suppression tests where drugs were administered by IV and blood was drawn every hour (they put a heplock in my arm so they don't have to keep sticking me). I got to go home for a weekend and then went back for the surgery - the Transsphenoidal Resection. I fully expected to die during surgery (and didn't care if I did) so I signed my will and wrote last letters to those I wanted to say goodbye to. During the time I was home just before surgery, a college classmate of mine (I didn't know her) did die at NIH of a Cushing's-related problem. I'm so glad I didn't find out until a couple months later!

November 3, 1987, the surgeon, Dr. Ed Oldfield, cut the gum above my front teeth under my upper lip so there is no scar. He used tiny tools and microscopes. My tumor was removed successfully. In some cases (not mine) the surgeon uses a plug of fat from the abdomen to help seal the cut. Afterwards, I was in intensive care overnight and went to a neurology ward for a few days until I could walk without being dizzy. I had some major headaches for a day or two but they gave me drugs (morphine) for those. Also, I had cotton plugs in my nostrils. It was a big day when they came out. I had diabetes insipidus (DI) for a little while, but that went away by itself - thank goodness!

I had to use a foam product called "Toothies" to brush my teeth without hitting the incision. Before they let me go home, I had to learn to give myself an injection in my thigh. They sent me home with a supply of injectible cortisone in case my level ever fell too low (it didn't). I was weaned gradually off cortisone pills (scary). I now take no medications. I had to get a Medic Alert bracelet. I will always need to tell medical staff when I have any kind of procedure - the effects of my excess cortisone will remain forever.

I went back to the NIH for several follow-up visits of a week each where they did all the blood and urine testing again. After a few years NIH set me free. Now I go to my "outside" endocrinologist every year for the dexamethasone suppression test, 24-hour urine and regular blood testing.

As I get further away from my surgery, I have less and less chance that my tumor will grow back. I have never lost all the weight I gained and I still have the hair on my chin but most of my other symptoms are gone. I am still and always tired and need a nap most days. I do not, however, still need to take whole days off just to sleep.

I consider myself very lucky that I was treated before I got as bad as some of the others on my floor at NIH but think it is crazy that these symptoms are not taken seriously by doctors.

My story goes on and if you're interested some is on this blog and some is here:

Forbes Magazine | MaryO's bio | Cushing's and Cancer Blog | Guest Speakers | Interview Archive  1/3/08 | Cushing's Awareness Day Testimonial Archive |

Because of this experience in getting a Cushing's diagnosis - and later, a prescription for growth hormone - I was concerned that there were probably other people not being diagnosed with Cushing's. When I searched online for Cushing's, all the sites that came up were for dogs and horses with Cushing's.  Not what I was looking for!

In July of 2000, I was talking with my dear friend Alice, who runs a wonderful menopause site, Power Surge, wondering why there weren't many support groups online (OR off!) for Cushing's.  This thought percolated through my mind for a few hours and I realized that maybe this was my calling.  Maybe I should be the one to start a network of support for other "Cushies" to help them empower themselves.

I wanted to educate others about the awful disease that took doctors years of my life to diagnose and treat - even after I gave them the information to diagnose me.  I didn't want anyone else to suffer for years like I did.  I wanted doctors to pay more attention to Cushing's disease.

The first website (http://www.cushings-help.com) went "live" July 21, 2000.  It was just a single page of information. The message boards began September 30, 2000 with a simple message board which then led to a larger one, and a larger.  Today, in 2010, we have over 7 thousand members.  Some "rare disease"!

The message boards are now very active and we have weekly online text chats, weekly live interviews, local meetings, conferences, email newsletters, a clothing exchange, a Cushing's Awareness Day Forum, podcasts, phone support and much more. Because I wanted to spread the word to others not on "the boards" we have extended out to social networking sites - twitter groups, facebook groups, twines, friendfeeds, newsletters, websites, chat groups, multiply.com, and much, much more.

People are becoming more empowered and participating in their own diagnoses, testing and treatment.  This have changed a lot since 1983!

When I had my Cushing's over 20 years ago, I never thought that I would meet another Cushing's patient in real life or online. Back then, I'd never even been aware that there was anything like an "online". I'm so glad that people struggling with Cushing's today don't have to suffer anymore thinking that they're the only one who deals with this.

Because of my work on the websites - and, believe me it is a ton of work! - I have had the honor of meeting over a hundred other Cushies personally at local meetings, conferences, at NIH (the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, MD where I had my final diagnosis and surgery). It occurred to me once that this is probably more than most endocrinologists will ever see in their entire career. I've also talked to countless others on the phone. Amazing for a "rare" disease!

I don't know what pushed me in 1983, how I got the confidence and self-empowerment to challenge these doctors and their non-diagnoses over the years.  I'm glad that I didn't suffer any longer than I did and I'm glad that I have a role in helping others to find the medical help that they need.

What do *YOU* think?  How are you becoming empowered?

 

Synchronous bilateral adrenalectomy by midline incision: A reliable method for treatment of hypercortisolism

Sayyed Abbas Tabatabaee, Sayyed Mozaffar Hashemi, Mohamadreza Fazel Najafabadi, Amirhossein Davarpanah Jazi

Abstract

• Cushing syndrome is one of the diseases associated with adrenals secreting too much cortisol. The syndrome was first described by Harvey Cushing in 1932.¹ It can be caused either by a tumor originating from the corticotroph cells located in pituitary glands, called corticotroph adenoma, or primary adrenal hyperplasia. It can be also the consequence of some other rare conditions such as ectopic corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) causing increased adrenocorticotropic (ACTH) secretion and macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (a primary pigmented nodular adrenal disease).^2,3 To manage the situation, previous articles demonstrated some strategies including two main groups of surgical treatments and non-surgical procedures.

  Surgical interventions are very important to completely cure this condition. Pituitary surgery, referred to as transsphenoidal operation, is the treatment of choice for patients with secondary disease.² However, in some situations, e.g. in patients with recurrent or persistent Cushing syndrome and those not responding to medical therapies after the surgery, the effectiveness of pituitary surgery is under question. Such patients are the best candidates for bilateral adrenalectomy. Some previous articles outlined this method.⁴ Laparoscopy is one of the methods recently used for adrenalectomy. During the surgery, some complications may occur which deteriorates patient's condition with noticeable rates of 9.5 to 12%. These complications are bleeding, organ damages, pain and deep vein thrombosis.^7,8
  
  Although in recent years the experts have achieved great improvements in management and treatment of the patients suffering from Cushing syndrome, some controversies still exist. In this manuscript, we explained a new method to accomplish a reliable bilateral adrenalectomy to manage the disease and cure the condition completely.

  After opening the abdomen, left adrenal gland is determined and adjacent vessels are ligated. Then, the enlarged adrenal gland would be entirely removed. However, adrenalectomy at the right side is not as simple as the left side. Renal vein detachment from the inferior vena cava can be a serious complication of right adrenalectomy if it is performed without enough exposure and experience. Massive bleeding in such clinical setting may significantly compromise patient's outcome. To avoid this complication during the procedure we can perform a new method explained below.
  Access to the right gland cannot be obtained by conventional retraction of the liver and it is necessary to mobilize the right hepatic lobe by fully incising the falciform ligament, the right triangular ligament, and rotating the right lobe medially. In this procedure, the bare area of the liver is dissected from the diaphragm. Care must be taken to avoid twisting and occluding the vena cava during this maneuver. After medial rotation of the liver in the proper position, the right adrenal and inferior vena cava can be directly visualized. This excellent exposure makes adrenalectomy very simple and minimizes the risk for renal vein detachment as a significant complication.

  This method was conducted on 6 cases admitted due to Cushing syndrome in Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. While no major complications were observed, favorable outcomes were found in the 6-month follow-up period.

  Based on our experience, bilateral adrenalectomy via a midline incision is a promising and acceptable technique for patients with Cushing syndrome. However, due to excess adipose tissue and lack of enough exposure, adrenalectomy by lumbotomy in such patients has prominent limitations. Therefore, midline incision provides feasible exposure for direct visualization of both adrenals.

Full Text: PDF
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

---

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

 

Investigational drugs may expand medical treatment of Cushing’s syndrome

Endocrinologists face many challenges when treating patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Diagnosis can be difficult because many of the disease’s characteristics, such as obesity, depression and hypertension, are also common in the general population.

Treating the disease presents hurdles as well. With its potential for total cure, transsphenoidal surgery remains the first-line treatment. However, the problems of achieving permanent remission in all cases demonstrate the need for medical therapies for this condition.

Currently, endocrinologists use several medical therapies to treat hypercortisolism, although none have FDA approval for that particular indication. Two new investigational drugs — mifepristone (Korlym, Corcept Therapeutics) and pasireotide (SOM230, Novartis) — have the potential to meet those unmet needs, according to experts interviewed by Endocrine Today.

“Recently completed research studies, which involved innovative medical therapeutic strategies that target the corticotroph adenoma itself or block the effects of cortisol in the periphery, should bring new treatment options in the future,” Maria Fleseriu, MD, associate professor, director of the Northwest Pituitary Center at Oregon Health & Science University, said in an interview.

Manufacturers of both new medications have submitted new drug applications to the FDA. Corcept expects to hear from the FDA on Feb. 17, according to a spokesperson for the company.

Mifepristone has a unique mode of action in that it blocks the cortisol receptor, Robert L. Roe, MD, president of Corcept Therapeutics, said in an interview.

“With that receptor blocked, many of the problems associated with Cushing’s syndrome can be greatly improved, including: obesity, diabetes, insulin resistance, high blood pressure, quality of life and depression,” Roe said.

The SEISMIC trial, a 24-week, multicenter, open-label study, included 50 patients with persistent or recurring Cushing’s disease, metastatic adrenal cortical carcinoma or ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) syndrome that was not amenable to surgery, according to Fleseriu, who was an investigator on the study. There were two primary endpoints: blood sugar improvement in patients with glucose intolerance and an improvement in BP in patients with a diagnosis of hypertension but without abnormal blood sugar levels. The key secondary endpoint looked for global clinical improvement as determined by a three-member independent data review board.

Results from the phase 3 study showed that, overall, mifepristone yielded significant clinical and metabolic improvement in patients with refractory Cushing’s syndrome, Fleseriu said. Of the glucose-intolerant patients, 60% responded, and BP improved in 38% of patients. The global clinical endpoint was positive in 87% of patients, Roe said.

 

Maria Fleseriu

 

“In addition, out of 34 patients who completed the main study, 30 elected to continue in the long-term extension study,” Fleseriu said.

She said mifepristone “offers a new approach for the treatment of Cushing’s syndrome that [has] failed other therapies. Keeping in mind that biochemical parameters will not be available for monitoring these patients, close clinical observation is recommended.”

Yet, there are aspects of mifepristone that are still unknown.

“There will be a learning curve with this drug on how to dose it and use it properly to get a good response,” said James Findling, MD, professor of medicine, Endocrinology Center and Clinics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, who was the principal investigator of the study.

 

James Findling

 

Also on the horizon is the investigational agent pasireotide, a multiligand somatostatin analogue with a high affinity for the somatostatin receptor type 5, which is often expressed by corticotroph adenomas in Cushing’s disease. Pasireotide blocks the secretions from ACTH-secreting pituitary tumors.

“Pasireotide works by attacking the pituitary tumor to reduce the ACTH level,” according to Laurence Katznelson, MD, professor of medicine and neurosurgery at Stanford University and medical director of the pituitary program at Stanford Hospital and Clinics. “Possibly, this drug could prevent tumor growth or lead to tumor shrinkage, although we await data to support that.”

Results of the multicenter, phase 3 PASPORT-CUSHINGS trial, presented at the Endocrine Society’s 93rd Annual Meeting & Expo in June, included 162 patients with persistent/recurrent or newly diagnosed Cushing’s disease who were ineligible for surgery. Researchers randomly assigned participants to receive twice-daily subcutaneous pasireotide injections of 600 mcg or 900 mcg. The primary endpoint was urinary-free cortisol levels at 6 months without dose up-titration.

Of the patients in the 900-mcg dose group, 26.3% had normal urinary-free cortisol levels at 6 months; at 12 months, 25% maintained normal levels. The median reduction from baseline in urine-free cortisol after 6 months of treatment was 47.9% for both dose groups.

The researchers noted significant clinical benefit in most patients, including lower BP and total cholesterol, as well as weight loss, Fleseriu said.

“It is noteworthy that while urinary-free cortisol normalization was seen in just a subset of patients, the rate of normalization was higher in patients with lower baseline urinary-free cortisol, making it, in my opinion, an attractive treatment for patients with mild elevations in urinary-free cortisol,” Fleseriu, who was also an investigator for this trial, told Endocrine Today.

Pasireotide was well tolerated in the studies, she added.

“Adverse events were comparable to the other somatostatin analogues, with the exception of a much higher incidence of hyperglycemia,” Fleseriu said. “Patients treated with this drug will require strict monitoring and prompt treatment of hyperglycemia.” The reasons for hyperglycemia are related to inhibition of insulin release from the pancreas by this multiligand somatostatin analogue. The type 5 receptor is abundant on pancreatic insulin secreting cells of the pancreas.

Timely diagnosis, treatment critical

Cushing’s syndrome is the result of chronic exposure to high levels of cortisol. Cortisol, typically released in stressful situations, controls how the body uses carbohydrates, fats and proteins. In addition, it helps decrease the immune system’s response to inflammation.

Untreated, Cushing’s syndrome can have serious consequences, including significant mortality and morbidity. Timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment are critical for this rare disorder, according to Fleseriu, who is also associate professor of medicine/endocrinology and neurological surgery at Oregon Health & Science University.

The endocrinologist uses the following tests to diagnose the disorder: 24-hour urinary-free cortisol levels; late-night salivary cortisol measurements; and low-dose dexamethasone suppression test.

After making the diagnosis of hypercortisolism, the next step is to determine the cause of excess cortisol secretion. There are several tests available for this purpose: corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) simulation test; direct radiologic visualization of the pituitary and adrenal glands; and inferior petrosal sinus sampling for ACTH.

The most common cause is long-term synthetic steroid use to treat inflammatory illnesses such as asthma or rheumatoid arthritis, according to Katznelson. In these cases, gradually reduction of the glucocorticoid will reverse the disorder.

Another cause is an ACTH-secreting pituitary adenoma. The excess stimulates the adrenals to produce and secrete excess cortisol release, Katznelson said. This is also known as Cushing’s disease.

Pituitary adenomas are responsible for 70% of Cushing’s syndrome cases, according to information from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

Surgery is first-line treatment

 

John Carmichael

 

First-line therapy for Cushing’s disease is transsphenoidal adenomectomy, in which the surgeon approaches the pituitary through the nose and, using either a microscope or endoscope by trained neurosurgeons, according to John Carmichael, MD, assistant professor of medicine, The Pituitary Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles.

The procedure boasts an excellent cure rate.

“In good hands, with a small tumor, you can get cure rates of about 85%,” Carmichael said. “It depends on a number of factors: the skill of the surgeon, the size of the tumor and the level of invasiveness.”

If surgery is curative, the patient will require cortisol replacement.

“Once you remove the tumor, the normal tissue has been suppressed by the activity of the tumor for so long that it takes a long time for patients to recover and start making cortisol on their own,” Carmichael said. “It can take as long as 6 to 12 months for patients to completely recover their normal cortisol secretion once they’ve been cured.”

 

David M. Cook

 

However, the surgery is associated with risks, including bleeding and infection, although they are “pretty rare,” according to Carmichael. One of the most common risks is a pituitary injury that can cause diabetes insipidus, which is almost always transient. Other postoperative problems include possible cerebrospinal fluid leaks and the possibility of recurrence, said David M. Cook, MD, an endocrinologist in the department of medicine, Oregon Health & Sciences University.

Sometimes the tumor is hard to find during the first surgery, Katznelson said.

“The problem is, in 40% to 50% of patients who have Cushing’s disease, the tumor is very small, if not almost invisible, on the MRI scan,” he said. As a result, the surgeon may remove normal gland or possibly the entire pituitary, resulting in hypopituitarism. The patient would require hormone replacement and would still have Cushing’s syndrome.

Radiation is a possible treatment for these cases.

“The role of radiation is in the patient who has already had surgery for Cushing’s syndrome. The tumor is visible but cannot be completely removed. Radiation is most useful when there is a target to irradiate,” Katznelson said, adding that even in these cases, radiation cannot promise 100% efficacy.

Unfortunately, radiation takes a significant amount of time to work.

“People are a little reluctant to use radiation because it takes years to help,” Cook said. “It is not curative and patients can relapse from radiation also; it is not foolproof.”

Ectopic ACTH syndrome

Sometimes, tumors located outside the pituitary can produce ACTH, resulting in the ectopic ACTH syndrome. The tumors are usually malignant. In more than half of the cases, the tumors are found in the lungs, according to information from the NIDDK.

“You would need surgery in that location to get rid of the tumor,” Carmichael said.

If an adrenal tumor is stimulating an overabundance of cortisol, the definitive cure is adrenalectomy.

“If we do adrenalectomy, all of the [symptoms of] Cushing’s syndrome go away, but the primary pituitary tumor, which may have been microscopic, can start to become more aggressive and grow and become more difficult to treat in the long run,” Katznelson said. “That is Nelson’s syndrome.”

The adrenal insufficiency that follows adrenalectomy is serious, Cook said.

“It is dangerous to not have your adrenals; it is the most dangerous disease that endocrinologists treat,” he said. “A number of sudden deaths have been reported in patients without adrenals.”

Katznelson also said that managing these patients can be challenging.

“Management of primary adrenal insufficiency is sometimes difficult, because not only does the patient lack cortisol, but will also lack aldosterone, which is important for maintaining electrolytes and volume status,” he said. “Patients often find it quite challenging to manage primary adrenal insufficiency.”

Medical therapies for Cushing’s syndrome

Besides surgery and radiation, endocrinologists can use several medical therapies to treat Cushing’s syndrome; however, to date, none has obtained FDA approval to treat the disorder.

The medical treatment used most often in the United States is ketoconazole, an antifungal agent that blocks the enzymes in the adrenal glands that produce steroids, Findling told Endocrine Today.

Ketoconazole, administered two to three times daily, is generally successful.

“It is an effective therapy,” Findling said. “Probably 50% to 70% of patients will have a response.”

However, this drug is not the optimal choice for long-term use.

“Ketoconazole has been associated with some toxicity; liver function abnormalities can occur and, in fact, liver failure can occur,” he said.

Another medical treatment option is mitotane (Lysodren, Bristol-Myers Squibb), which blocks adrenal steroid enzymes, Findling said. This toxic agent takes considerable time to work; in fact, it may require roughly 3 or 4 months for cortisol levels to normalize. It is used rarely in the United States.

“Mitotane has a limited future as a therapy for Cushing’s syndrome, except for in patients who have adrenal cancer, at least in the US,” Findling said.

Metyrapone (Metopirone, Novartis), another agent, effectively blocks adrenal steroid enzymes; however, it is not commercially available in the United States, Findling said.

Etomidate is an anesthetic agent that also inhibits adrenal steroidogenesis and is employed successfully in patients with very severe hypercortisolism who are not ready for surgery.

“If etomidate were available in a pill, it would be an excellent medical treatment for Cushing’s syndrome,” Findling said. “With subhypnotic doses, etomidate lowers the cortisol level smoothly down into the normal range. … It is well tolerated, but has to be given as a continuous IV infusion, so it is not practical.”

All of these medications have severe adverse effect profiles, according to Carmichael.

No replacement for surgery … yet

Although mifepristone and pasireotide show some promise as treatments for Cushing’s syndrome, it is not time to put the scalpels in storage, the experts said.

“Neither of these drugs, at least for the foreseeable future, will replace surgical treatment of Cushing’s syndrome,” Findling said. “Like most disorders, if you have a surgical procedure that will resolve the endocrinopathy and restore normal hormonal function, it is usually the treatment of choice.”

However, these medications are a welcome addition to the armamentarium, Carmichael said.

“It remains to be seen exactly what their place will be and how they will be best used. But, certainly, in cases where surgery is not an option or where you need to control the disease in someone who has very severe disease, they would have a role,” he said. Currently, Carmichael sees medical therapy as an adjuvant treatment, which would follow surgery if it was not curative. Also, endocrinologists may use them in place of surgery if surgery was not an option.

“There is a lot more room for work,” Carmichael said. “The ideal paradigm of having a medication that is safe and controls the disease and in a sense would replace surgery would be an ideal goal, but we are certainly not there yet.”– by Colleen Owens

For more information:

• Colao A. OR09-6. Presented at: The Endocrine Society 93rd Annual Meeting & Expo; June 4-7, 2011; Boston.
• Fleseriu M. [OR09-5] Mifepristone, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, produces clinical and metabolic benefits in patients with refractory Cushing syndrome: results from the Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Mifepristone in the Treatment of Endogenous Cushing Syndrome (SEISMIC). Presented at: The Endocrine Society 93rd Annual Meeting & Expo; June 4-7, 2011; Boston.
• Gross BA. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;23:E10.
• National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. NINDS Cushing’s syndrome information page. Available at: www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/cushings/cushings.htm.
• National Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases Information Service. Cushing’s syndrome. Available at: www.endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/cushings/cushings.aspx#causes.

Disclosures: Dr. Fleseriu is principal investigator in multiple Cushing’s trials and past consultant for Novartis; she is also the principal investigator on Corcept Cushing’s trials. Dr. Findling is a paid consultant for Corcept Therapeutics. The other doctors in this article did not report any relevant financial disclosures.

Which is the most reliable screening method for Cushing’s syndrome?

Tests are equally accurate, but have limitations

The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is problematic. It is one of the most difficult endocrine diseases to diagnose. Diagnosis includes assessing the symptoms and signs of Cushing’s syndrome because the symptoms and signs overlap with common disorders, including obesity, depression and polycystic ovary syndrome. Many patients consult websites in an attempt to find an explanation for their weight gain, fatigue, depression and other symptoms. They ask frequently after a Web search if their symptoms could be Cushing’s syndrome.

Screening tests for Cushing’s syndrome include three different tests: an 11 p.m. or midnight salivary cortisol level; a 24-hour urine free cortisol level; and an 8 a.m. cortisol level after ingestion of 1 mg of dexamethasone at midnight the previous night. How reliable are these tests? They are equally accurate — approximately 90% to 92% reliable, which is actually good for screening tests.

However, all three tests have limitations. Results of the nighttime salivary cortisol test are affected by laboratory accuracy (not all laboratories are equally reliable) and sleep patterns. In severe depression cases, the results may be falsely elevated. The 24-hour urine free cortisol test is an indicator of overall cortisol production. The most accurate method of measurement — tandem mass spectrometry with concomitant measurement of urine volume and urine creatinine — provides a good measure. It may take several 24-hour urine collections to confirm hypercortisolism. The 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test is reliable, but with several caveats. The test is standardized according to administering dexamethasone at midnight and measurement of serum cortisol promptly at 8 a.m. the following day. However, while the patient may have gone to the lab at 8 a.m., the blood sample may have been obtained later, which invalidates the test. Additionally, if the patient is taking medications that alter dexamethasone metabolism, the results may not be valid. The endocrinologist must measure a serum dexamethasone level to confirm the validity of the test.

The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is dependent upon confirming consistent overproduction of cortisol. The diagnosis may require repeated testing and this should be done in any patient in which there is a suspicion of Cushing’s syndrome.

Mary Lee Vance, MD, is professor of medicine and neurosurgery at University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Va.

Disclosure: Dr. Vance reports no relevant financial disclosures.

Late-night salivary cortisol is best initial test

 

Ty Carroll

 

No test is perfect for all patients. In addition, it is important to remember that some patients will require multiple, different tests to confirm or exclude Cushing’s syndrome. However, that being said, late-night salivary cortisol is the best initial screening for most patients with suspected Cushing’s syndrome.

Late-night salivary cortisol is the most specific test for Cushing’s syndrome. The sensitivity and specificity are very good. Multiple studies have examined late night salivary cortisol testing, and the majority of those studies show sensitivity of more than 95% and a specificity in the range of 90% to 100%. That is comparable to — or better than — other methods to diagnose Cushing’s syndrome.

Also important to note: It is easy for patients to perform late-night salivary testing. Patients are able to do the collection at home and mail in the completed samples to a reference lab, whereas urinary free cortisol and dexamethasone suppression testing can be difficult for some patients to complete. In addition, for the most part, late-night salivary cortisol is not affected by other medications that patients take, unlike dexamethasone suppression testing, which can be affected by several medications that patients often take to treat other conditions.

Ty Carroll, MD, is assistant professor of medicine at Endocrinology Center and Clinics, Menomonee Falls, Wisc.

Disclosure: Dr. Carroll is an investigator in Corcept’s clinical trials of mifepristone.

 

From http://www.endocrinetoday.com/view.aspx?rid=90578

Selective inferior petrosal sinus sampling without venous outflow diversion in the detection of a pituitary adenoma in Cushing’s syndrome

Lukas Andereggen, Gerhard Schroth, Jan Gralla, Rolf Seiler, Luigi Mariani, Jürgen Beck, Hans-Rudolf Widmer, Robert H. Andres, Emanuel Christ and Christoph Ozdoba

Neuroradiology

DOI: 10.1007/s00234-011-0915-6

• Download PDF (312.5 KB)
• View HTML

Abstract

Introduction  

Conventional MRI may still be an inaccurate method for the non-invasive detection of a microadenoma in adrenocorticotropin (ACTH)-dependent Cushing’s syndrome (CS). Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) with ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone (oCRH) stimulation is an invasive, but accurate, intervention in the diagnostic armamentarium surrounding CS. Until now, there is a continuous controversial debate regarding lateralization data in detecting a microadenoma. Using BIPSS, we evaluated whether a highly selective placement of microcatheters without diversion of venous outflow might improve detection of pituitary microadenoma.

Methods  

We performed BIPSS in 23 patients that met clinical and biochemical criteria of CS and with equivocal MRI findings. For BIPSS, the femoral veins were catheterized bilaterally with a 6-F catheter and the inferior petrosal sinus bilaterally with a 2.7-F microcatheter. A third catheter was placed in the right femoral vein. Blood samples were collected from each catheter to determine ACTH blood concentration before and after oCRH stimulation.

Results  

In 21 patients, a central-to-peripheral ACTH gradient was found and the affected side determined. In 18 of 20 patients where transsphenoidal partial hypophysectomy was performed based on BIPSS findings, microadenoma was histologically confirmed. BIPSS had a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 67% after oCRH stimulation in detecting a microadenoma. Correct localization of the adenoma was achieved in all Cushing’s disease patients.

Conclusion  

BIPSS remains the gold standard in the detection of a microadenoma in CS. Our findings show that the selective placement of microcatheters without venous outflow diversion might further enhance better recognition to localize the pituitary tumor.

Keywords  Angiography, Digital subtraction – Cushing disease – Petrosal sinus sampling – Pituitary gland – Magnetic resonance imaging

Fulltext Preview

From http://www.springerlink.com/content/l487284736173002/

Treatments for Pituitary Tumors

Pituitary Adenoma

Located at the base of the skull, the pituitary gland serves as the body’s control center for hormones. Pituitary adenomas are slow growing, benign tumors within the gland.

Patients are diagnosed with an MRI scan and an endocrinological evaluation that determines whether hormone levels have been affected by the tumor. If the tumor is large, a visual evaluation may be needed as well.

Small tumors less than 1 centimeter are called microadenomas, while tumors larger than 1 centimeter are macroadenomas. Pituitary tumors are also divided into functioning and nonfunctioning varieties. As the terms imply, functioning tumors produce hormones, though often in large, unregulated amounts. Nonfunctioning tumors don’t produce significant amounts of hormones.

What are the symptoms?

Symptoms of pituitary adenomas depend on the type of hormone production affected by the tumor.

A tumor that produces large amounts of ACTH causes a condition known as Cushing Disease, which leads to obesity, high blood pressure, and muscle weakness, among other symptoms. A prolactinoma produces large amounts of prolactin. Symptoms include irregular menstruation, sexual dysfunction and breast discharge. A growth-hormone producing tumor leads to acromegaly, a condition that causes progressive enlargement of hands and feet as well as altered facial features.

A nonfunctioning adenoma leads to problems by compressing the pituitary gland and decreases or even cuts off normal hormone production.

Large tumors also can affect the optic nerves leading to a form of tunnel vision called bitemporal hemianopsia. In some cases, a pituitary adenoma causes headaches or a sensation of pressure or fullness behind the eyes. Rarely, bleeding into a tumor can lead to severe headaches, along with double and blurred vision.

What are the treatment options?

Surgery

Medication can help correct hormone production with pituitary adenomas, though the gold-standard treatment is surgical removal. Doctors remove, or resect, as much of the tumor as safely as possible to eliminate pressure on the optic structures and remove parts of the tumor affecting hormone production.

Most pituitary surgeries don’t involve cutting into the skull. Surgeons access the gland through the sphenoid sinus, an air-filled space behind the nose, in a procedure known as transsphenoidal surgery. An incision is made either under the patient’s lip or inside the nose. A variation of the surgery using endoscopic assistance is even less invasive.

The major risk of transsphenoidal surgery is injury to the carotid arteries, to nearby tissues that affect vision or to healthy pituitary tissues that are often indistinguishable from the tumor. If the pituitary gland doesn’t function properly after surgery, the patient may require life-long hormone replacement.

Not all pituitary tumors require treatment. Sometimes a microadenoma is found on an MRI scan performed for other reasons. In such cases, a period of observation may be recommended. Treatment may be needed only when the microadenoma enlarges over time.

Radiation therapy

If the entire tumor can’t be removed surgically, radiation treatment may be needed to prevent its growth. Radiation may be an option for patients who are medically unable to undergo surgery or who oppose surgery.

Conventional radiation therapy uses a comparatively small number of radiation beams on the entire region around the pituitary gland, which usually results in a significant amount of normal, healthy tissue being irradiated as well. To compensate, conventional radiation treatment is given in daily doses over several weeks. The technique is generally effective in preventing tumor growth and in correcting hormone-producing tumors for many years.

Radiation therapy usually results in lower hormone production. Therefore, even if a pituitary adenoma doesn’t affect the patient’s hormone production, treatment with conventional radiation therapy can cause abnormally low hormone levels. In treating adenomas, conventional radiation therapy also irradiates nearby parts of optic tissues, though the risks of impaired vision are usually low.

Stereotactic radiosurgery

A newer option for treating pituitary adenomas, radiosurgery focuses radiation on the tumor only, minimizing exposure to other tissues. Emerging data indicates radiosurgery may be more effective than conventional radiation in lowering abnormal hormone production and does so over a shorter time period.

Most radiosurgery techniques are one-time treatments, which increases the risk of some side effects, including vision loss. The risk of radiation injury is greater for patients when the tumor is close to or involves nearby optic tissues or part of the brain known as the hypothalamus. For higher-risk patients, staged, or fractionated, treatments may reduce the risk of injuring other tissues.

How effective is CyberKnife treatment?

Treating pituitary adenomas with the CyberKnife combines the advantages of conventional radiation and radiosurgery. Since CyberKnife performs radiosurgery, radiation exposure is limited to the adenoma. CyberKnife treatment can be fractionated, however, like conventional radiation therapy.

This approach lessens the radiation risk to sensitive structures around the tumor, like optic tissues and part of the brain known as the hypothalamus. CyberKnife fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery is also well suited for treating adenomas that invade the cavernous sinus, which contains nerves that control eye movement and facial sensation.

CyberKnife works best with:

• Patients with small tumors that overproduce a pituitary hormone
• Patients who have a residual tumor after transsphenoidal surgery
• Patients with hormone-producing tumors and who continue to have higher than normal hormone levels after surgery
• Patients with an adenoma that has invaded the cavernous sinus
• Patients who are unable to have or opposed to transsphenoidal surgery

From http://www.chicagock.com/conditions-treated/brain-tumors/pituitary-adenoma/

Cushing's Disease Treatment

A 19-year-old woman was referred to Dr. Adriana Ioachimescu for evaluation following an abnormal 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test. She started to experience weight gain, hirsutism and oligomenorrhea at age 16. At that time, she was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, which was not controlled, despite oral medications and 200 units of insulin daily. A few months before her initial visit to the Emory Pituitary Center, the patient experienced a hip fracture and required surgery. On examination, it was discovered that she had typical Cushing’s stigmata, severe proximal myopathy and depression. She was unable to walk without assistance.

Laboratory testing results were remarkable for hypokalemia, elevated serum cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels, and elevated bedtime salivary cortisol (15 times above normal). A high-dose dexamethasone suppression test was equivocal. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary gland showed no abnormalities. The patient was scheduled for a corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) test; however, she was unable to keep the appointment due to MRSA sepsis/perineal cellulitis.

Dr. Ioachimescu started the patient on ketoconazole, which she took for three months, along with multiple courses of antibiotics, during which her diabetes and hypokalemia improved. Once the MRSA infection cleared, she underwent inferior petrosal sinus sampling at Emory University Hospital, which showed a 5:1 central-to-periphery gradient on the right side. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis and an octreoscan did not identify a tumor.

Dr. Oyesiku performed 3-D transsphenoidal endoscopic surgery to remove the tumor causing Cushing’s disease, and her postoperative cortisol on postoperative day three was low at 1.4 mcg/dL. The patient did not experience postoperative endocrine or neurosurgical complications. She required hydrocortisone postoperatively and lost 19 kg in the first three months following the procedure. Her appearance, mood and muscle strength improved significantly.

This case illustrates challenges related to diagnosis of Cushing’s disease in the setting of multiple complications. An accurate diagnosis was made only after inferior petrosal sinus sampling. Treatment with transsphenoidal surgery was successful, despite a lack of tumor identification by preoperative imaging. At the Emory Pituitary Center, Cushing’s disease has a 92% rate of remission at three months following surgery. These statistics are based on the electronic database review of almost 70 patients with Cushing’s disease operated on by Dr. Oyesiku over a period of 15 years. Based on Dr. Ioachimescu’s research, cortisol levels lower than 5 mcg/dL in the first two postoperative days are predictive of surgical success, but do not correlate with recurrence rate.

From http://emoryheartfailure.com/neurosciences/case-studies/cushings-treatment.html

Pituitary Surgery Observations

From Kate, one week post op: http://cushings.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=19414

Hello, my dear friends,

It is strange to be writing to you from the other side of surgery (well, at least this time somewhat coherently, as my prior post-op posts have been, let's say, lubricated nicely by some very nice pain pills). It seems not too long ago, I was writing my introduction post back in August, then posting questions about testing, months of which are now thankfully over.

Some of you may remember my first posts, and I can't believe that it's only been 5 months ago that I was telling my story and searching for answers. Today, I post both because I learned some things through the surgical process, which I wanted to share with those of you who may be doing this after me. But I also post because this is my denouement...the post-climactic events in my Cushing. (Don't worry, though -- I'm not going to leave!)

PRE-OP SUGGESTIONS:

1. IN-PERSON PRE-SURGICAL CONSULT
Go see the surgeon in advance of surgery. If you can afford to actually go see the surgeon face-to-face ahead of time, I recommend it. This is brain surgery. Yes, it's an additional expense for travel, but if you can, make it happen. You will thank yourself, and you will walk out of that consult with a clear confirmation whether the surgeon will perform your surgery or whether there may be additional tests, labs, reports, referrals, etc. needed prior to that agreement.

Because I'd been fortunate to have this consult, by the time I reached the surgeon on Wednesday (before the Friday surgery) to drop off my films, he basically said, "We already met, and I have nothing to add to our prior conversation, but I'd be glad to answer any questions you may have at this time." The appointment lasted about 2 minutes. Seriously. I think having met the surgeon and him having already agreed to do my surgery meant that no questions were left to be answered -- by either of us -- by the time I went for the operation.

2. INSURANCE: Make sure your insurance is in order. You probably need a referral to the surgeon for "evaluation and treatment"; this referral comes from your PCP to the surgeon. Most surgeon's offices will handle the preauthorization with your insurance company for you. Mine did. Still, for my own peace of mind, I checked with my insurance company more than once to make sure that they had the preauthorization approved.

3. PAPERWORK:
A. LABS - Even if you've had a pre-surgical consult, or even if you've mailed your labs ahead of time, PLEASE do yourself a favor and go to surgery with your paperwork in perfect order. This means even if you have your films and labs already in the hands of the surgeon, ALSO bring a copy of your labs with you!

B. REFERRAL - This next one is non-negotiable: HAVE A REFERRAL FOR SURGERY BEFORE you arrive for surgery. If possible, have a copy of this written referral in your hands. You can arrange this by having your referring endocrinologist copy you on the referral letter/email. Just print it out and make it part of your folder. You cannot self-refer for surgery. You MUST have a referring endocrinologist confirm your diagnosis, the basis for the Dx, and put in writing his recommendation and referral for surgery. If you do not have this, then do not expect to pass go or collect $200. Them's just the facts.

C. PRE-SURGICAL PHYSICAL REPORT - You will have to have a pre-surgical physical. There will be bloodwork, and EKG, possibly a cardiac workup (if necessary), a chest X-ray, and whatever else your surgeon and PCP feel may be necessary to ensure your safe release for surgery. Once all of these tests are completed, it is then necessary to ensure that the report actually makes it to the surgeon's office. I learned this the hard way because I'd coincidentally had a pre-surgical physical for the cancelled IPSS, which had been scheduled as the same day I had surgery instead. Although I'd anticipated that my physical report would therefore wind up at UCLA (where the IPSS was scheduled) instead of Pittsburgh (where surgery was scheduled), and even though this did in fact happen, it only took a couple of phone calls to make sure my surgical clearance report finally made it to the surgeon's office. Two days before surgery, or more (if you have more notice than I did), just sit down for an hour or two and make phone calls to make sure everything is in order and where it needs to be.

D. SELF-CREATED SURGICAL PACKET - Once all of the above is accomplished, the most helpful thing you can do for yourself is to put together a packet to take with you to the surgeon:

• Labs
• Concise list of labs (listing all high numbers, dates, times categorized by test type)
• Referral letter from your endocrinologist with the diagnostic basis for your referral
• Films (Originals AND/OR on CD -- I brought both)
• Pre-Surgical Physical report from Primary Care Doctor

I put my referral letter on top, my own synopsis list of labs under that, then the labs, then the physical report, and I had the clipped together and handed to the surgeon's staff upon my arrival. Maybe some of it was duplicitous, but that way, they had everything they could need at their fingertips.

4. PACKING: Pack well, but lightly. You won't be wearing a lot of clothes, and there are only so many nightgowns you can wear. Take two sets of clothes and two nightgowns, a robe and some slippers with outdoor-type soles, and then slog around in those slippers even after surgery when you are back in clothes and traveling. My sweetie husband bought me some UGG slippers with shearling insides and rubber soles, and I haven't taken them off since I got out of surgery -- even wore them to the doctor yesterday, the lab for draws on Tuesday, and plan to wear them until I am feeling like my feet don't need the comfort of something soft and warm again.

I think Mary printed my packing list in one of the recent newsletters, but I just wanted to confirm YOU DON'T NEED TO TAKE MUCH STUFF. I didn't feel like reading, playing cards, or even really watching TV. So unless you are going somewhere where they do a traditional rather than endoscopic approach (meaning you will be in the hospital more than overnight), skip the toys and such. Every other need you have will be met by the hospital.

5. PRESCRIPTIONS - Get your regular med AND post-surgical meds filled prior to leaving your hometown, if possible. This includes cortef AND injectable solucortef PLUS syringes. Not all pharmacies stock this stuff, so plan ahead a couple of days so they can order it if necessary.

6. BUY A PIK-STICK - This is a thing with a handle on one end and pinchers on the other, which will help you retrieve things off the floor post-op. Trust me, this is a good purchase. $15 at your local pharmacy or Walmart, etc.

7. PREPARE YOUR ENVIRONMENT FOR POST-OP - Get your house clean. Hire someone if you can't do it or don't have family to help. I've never had help, and this was the best thing I did for myself. I came home to a spotless house, which relieved a lot of stress.

Plan where you will sleep upright after surgery. A recliner or a chair with ottoman and pillows both work well. Gather bed pillows to prop under legs. Have a small table next to whereever you will sleep/spend the day. Put lip balm, a coaster for drinks, Puffs Plus with lotion tissues on it, and anything else you think you will need close at hand.

Make arrangements for who will help care for you post-op. You will need intense care for at least a week, and maybe two. Don't be shy to ask people for help, and tell them to bring food rather than flowers. I have enough soup in my freezer for a month, and I don't have to worry about cooking for my husband....nice!

8. SAY GOODBYE TO WORK FOR A WHILE - Don't do what I did and take work to the hotel with you. If you had appendicitis, they would live without you. No one is indespensible. This used to bother me; this week, I am appreciating the revelation. Tell everyone you need limited contact, few visitors if any and NO STRESS after surgery.

SURGICAL SUGGESTIONS

1. LOCATE THE ROUTE TO THE HOSPITAL IN ADVANCE - Find your way to the hospital before the day of surgery. Or, do like I did and arrange to stay in a hotel near the hospital that has a shuttle service. Then, arrange for the shuttle to pick you up half an hour before your appointed registration time. If going to Pittsburgh, I cannot recommend enough staying at Springhill Suites in Northshores, 1 mile from Allegheny Hospital. They took us everywhere we needed to go, including downtown to a pharmacy. For free.

2. MAKE A LIST OF PHONE NUMBERS TO CALL AFTER SURGERY - Take a list of phone numbers for your family members to call when you are out of surgery. You won't feel up to it yourself, but they will be delighted to let your friends and other family know how you made out. I confess my list was developed from my cell phone call log after I was already registered and waiting to go down to anesthesia....which is only to say if my mother didn't call you after my surgery, it does NOT mean you are not my dear friend -- it only means I couldn't quickly access your number from my call log in order to give it to her. I wish I'd written the list out in advance, though, because it relieved me to know people knew the outcome as I knew they were waiting to hear.

3. CHILL OUT, THE SYNTHETIC WAY (IF NECESSARY) - If you are like me -- someone who has not done a lot of surgery, and also hasn't taken a lot of tranquilizers -- I HIGHLY RECOMMEND GETTING TUNED IN by some Xanax, Valium, Ativan or the like immediately after registration. Now, of course I had to arrange for this medication prior to surgery, and I did this through my PCP who thought it was a great idea to have something for anxiety. Then, I did not take it until I had cleared it with the surgical team after admission to the hospital. If you talked to me on the morning of surgery as I waited to go down, you probably had a good laugh. I'm a real hoot on 2 mg of Ativan, as Robin may attest!

The net effect of the tranquilizer was that by the time they wheeled me down to anesthesia, I was not only ready for surgey, I was okay with it, not scared, kind of excited to be moving forward after all of the waiting, making funny small talk with the hospital staff, etc. Maybe you won't need this, but for me, drugs....mmmmmmmm, mmmmmmm, goood!

4. TEE TEE BEFORE CHANGING INTO HOSPITAL GOWN - Use the bathroom BEFORE putting on the surgical gown. I had gone before leaving the hotel, and since I hadn't eaten or drank anything, I thought I wouldn't need to go. Then I found myself in a 2 hour wait down in the anethesia area, and suddenly I had to tinkle. It was, I'm sure, a pretty sight to see me hobbling down the hallway in that surgical gown, in those ugly socks (that are not shaped like feet, by the way), all zonked out on Ativan and waving at people.

Where I had surgery, they did NOT use a catheter, by the way.

5. WARM BLANKIE WHILE WAITING FOR SURGERY = GOOD STUFF - Tell them you are cold, even if your temperature is just right. That warm blanket was so comforting. Made me feel all snuggly and nice. A pre-surgical hug, if you will.

6. PREPARE INFO FOR SURGICAL TEAM - Tell your anesthesiologist/s EVERYTHING about yourself. Mine was a complicated case because of my sleep apnea, which is (was?) severe. They had prepared to intubate me while awake, if necessary. By the time I had the Versed, I truly, truly would NOT have cared!!! I was so ready for surgery by the time they wheeled me in and gave the Versed, I would have pushed the tube down for them if necessary. But because anesthesia is a risk in and of itself, be SURE to tell them about ANY breathing problems you have, even asthma, some congestion from a lingering cold, apnea, whatever. I wound up in ICU -- briefly -- after surgery, just as a precaution.

7. VERSED: THE POINT OF NO RETURN - Watch your mouth after the Versed. It will give you loose lips!!! Who knows what gems may have come out of my mouth....the one thing I remember was trying to hook up Dr. D with Robin's daughter, Sarah Beth. I do think I also told him he was Dr. D -- for "Dreamy." This was right before he told me he was married, and then the next thing I knew, I was in recovery.

8. SURGERY WAS NOT THAT BAD!!!! Mine lasted 2 1/2 hours. I had it endoscopically by Dr. J, who I am convinced is a world-class surgeon. It went "perfectly," according to my surgeon. Although I had a wicked headache and a nosebleed every time I stood up, it really was not that bad. Kind of like a migraine plus a low-grade flu, and the pain meds hooked me right up. I was doing so well that by 8 a.m. the next day, they had released me from the hospital. I elected to stay until 12, though, to get my last dose of pain meds before adiosing the hospital.

For those who asked, my tumor was 5mm on the right side, had grown down into and around my septum, had been there for years to have grown in that fashion, was not recognized by the radiologist who initially read my MRI, was seen as curiously small on film by the 3 surgeons who did recognize it, and had a 3mm extension/second tumor on the left side of the pit. Dr. J and Dr. D assured me that they felt they got it all and that they had even milked the gland afterwards, though I don't know what that means.

My tumor stained positive for ACTH, and there was plenty for pathology. I have not received the official report, but at 6 a.m. the morning after surgery, Dr. D gave me the truly overwhelming news that I had pathology-proven Cushing's. I wept, pumped his hand up and down, called my husband at the hotel, and according to my mom, my husband met her for breakfast with tears streaming from utter relief and validation at this news.

P.S. Have been told that my gland was preserved and that I may be able to get pregnant. After all this time. Despite Dr. W, my repro endo who for seven years never tested me for Cushings and told me I had PCO.

NOTE FOR THOSE INTERESTED: Remember that Jan. 9th appt. I'd scheduled back in the fall with Dr. W, the one they were really reluctant to schedule? I got a call on Jan. 8th at 8 a.m. from the office manager for the fertility practice informing me that Dr. W retired on Jan. 1. Veddy, veddy interesting. I think my malpractice attorney will find this news to be interesting as well.

9. STAY IN THE HOSPITAL TWO NIGHTS IF YOU WANT TO! I wound up staying back at the hotel the night after surgery, but it would have been nice to have been in that hospital bed, having a nurse bringing me Sprite Zeros and soft, nuggety ice and helping me to the bathroom. However, most medical professionals will agree that it's best to get out of the hospital as soon as you really safely can -- there's a lot of sick folks and germs in that place, after all!

10. P-BURGH = EXCELLENT CHOICE - If you choose to have surgery in Pittsburgh, you will be treated like royalty at every step of the way. Top-notch facility, private room with a stunning view of the city, comfortable bed, constant attention, true compassion from staff, support for your family as they wait for news of your successful procedure.

POST-OP
1. TRAVELLING AFTER SURGERY - Zonk up on pain meds and suck it up and do it. Home is better than hotel, and you won't remember much of the trip if you are on meds and have help from family to do it right. If travelling by car, take pillows and snuggly blankets.

2. PAIN - For me, there wasn't a lot. Then again, I chose to spend the first three days cross-eyed and drooling on Percocets before realizing I didn't really need them. I am still taking one at night to sleep or if I get a headache. But we are talking normal headache now, not the hatchet kind.

3. CONGESTION - You will have some, but keep in mind some of that is surgical swelling and not congestion. I learned this at my PCP yesterday who said she could see the tissue swelling. Mucinex works wonders for getting packed mucus to drain, but then expect some coughing as it tickles the throat. Some folks have used humidifiers, hot bowls of water with salt and a towel over the head, throad lozenges, saline sprays and mists, nose pots to rinse the sinuses. I've done the hot bowl of water twice, and hot showers. It's been one week, and the congestion is pretty much over.

NO: Nose blowing, snuffing up, hocking loogeys, back-swallowing. Also, no bending, reaching down, straining to get up or have a bowel movement (or, as I discovered last night, doing the long cat-stretch while making the cat-stretch noise - OUCH!)

YES: Drinking hot tea, following list above, laying your head back and letting it drain down your throat, sucking it up and realizing it is temporary. LET OTHERS DO FOR YOU. This is not the time to be superwoman.

4. MEDICATIONS - Buy a seven day pill box, then fill it with what you need for the day.
Set up "Crisis Central" with your crisis letter from your endo to take to the ER if necessary (also give this to your PCP ASAP), your solucortef injectable WITH syringes, instruction sheet on how to give the shot, etc. Take your medications on time. Make sure they remain filled and call early to refill.

5. AVOID STRESS - No work. Very few phone calls. Limit internet for at least one week, maybe more. No arguing or debating with anyone about anything. Let others take care of you, even if you've never done this before in your life.

6. SLEEP A LOT. Your body needs it to recover.

7. SNUGGLY BLANKET = BEST FRIEND after surgery. I got a microfleece blanket from Target, and it has been across my lap during the day and draped over me at night. It feels like being enveloped in warm marshmallow cream, or Cool Whip. Very good $29.99 expenditure. Added bonus if you have a sweet lap dog to curl up with you.

8. LISTEN TO YOUR BODY - Mine, at least, has been telling me things: hunger, pain, stress, anxiety, fatigue, weakness, energy, etc. Respond accordingly: take pain meds for pain, eat healthfully and in small amounts when hungry (or else nausea will ensue), take meds on time, don't be afraid to take Xanax or the ilk when stress comes on. I am managing some of these meds with my PCP, who thinks keeping things on a very even keel is a good idea. Since this is new to me, Ms. Intensity, I'm having to ease through this medicinally. Deep breathing exercises work, too.

9. SHOWERING - helps break up congestion and is a good way to perk up if you are feeling low. Just, be careful showering if you are weak. I take my cortef, then shower 45 minutes later when I have some energy. Then settle back down and be quiet. Your body needs stillness and quiet to heal.

10. DON'T PUSH IT. For me, post-op has been pretty much a breeze. No intense pain, only moderate nausea, pretty good adjustment to cortef. I do note I am emotional and somewhat unable to process simple stressors. For instance, even going over to the in-laws for a simple meal was too much last night, one week post-op. So I am doing things like letting the answering machine answer for me, etc. Build a cocoon, then live in it for a while. After years of Cushing's, YOU DESERVE IT (ME, TOO!)

http://cushings.invisionzone.com/index.php?showtopic=19291&st=80

Kate's Top Ten List of Pituitary Surgery Observations (In No Particular Order)

1. Presurgical jokes referencing your brain tumor as the cause for your apparent failing memory should be used judiciously; I only got two laughs out of at least a dozen tries.
2. One-size-fits-all hospital gowns actually come in two ranges: Regular Folks...and Great Big Ma'ama Jamma!!!! (Even that one swallowed me, and I'm a big 'un!)
3. Cost of red plastic hospital bracelet on which the nurse clearly wrote, "Allergic to latex, bandaids and adhesives": $2.50. Cost of roll of adhesive tape subsequently used in mass quantities on inner elbow by same nurse after serum draw: $4.00. Bic pen used by mother of patient, after pulling off tape and noting angry rash, to write on patient's inner arm funny frowny-faces and long arrows pointing to residual rashes: Priceless.
4. "Your surgery will be mid-morning and should last about two hours." Translation: "Register promptly at 7:15 a.m. and then plan to wait twelve hours before seeing your family again."
5. When the lady in recovery keeps calling your name and telling you she needs you to wake up, this is NOT the same thing as when you were a teenager and your mom threatened to get a glass of water while you turned over to go back to sleep. They really mean that s*&% when they say they want you to wake up!!
6. "Hey, what'reyou in here for?" = not a great opener when striking up a conversation with guy moaning next to you in recovery.
7. Two words upon standing, post op: Nose bleed!
8. Time between requests for beverages: 30 minutes. Time between trips to the bathroom to tinkle: 60 minutes. Time between doses of pain meds: 240 minutes. I know, because I counted! (like, for the past 24 hours!)
9. Never again will you so carefully examine your boogers and snot for evidence of the dreaded clear fluids (indicative of CSF leak). "Hey, Mom, does this look pink or red to you?"
10. Transnasal transsphenoidal endoscopic pituitary microadenectomy: as close to drive-through brain surgery as you can get!